the environmental waters are getting murkier these days, literally and figuratively.
i consider myself an environmentalist of convenience – i buy local, organic products wherever possible, use biodegradable cleaning products, and sold my car last year, opting to walk/bike/use public transit to get around. not to say these aren’t reasons to pat myself on the back, but it’s become way too easy to consider one’s carbon crimes forgiven just because that glass of wine at the end of the day is organic (and imported from chile).
i’ll admit it: i embark on long flights several times a year, buy new things whenever i want/need them, and take hot showers every day. i like cheese from far away places and eat kiwi fruit every once in a while. that’s right - kiwi fruit – the tasty treat that, through transportation from the other side of the planet, results in more than its own weight in carbon being emitted into the atmosphere. through every carbon footprint calculation i’ve ever tried, you would need about three planets to keep up with my rate of consumption. knowing what i do about climate change and the drastic effects it’s due to bring us, i’ll be the first to admit that i’m burying my head in the (oil) sands(s).
even consoling myself with the good choices i am making is getting harder to do. an article i recently came across makes a strong case for why cycling is actually worse for the planet than driving. karl ulrich argues that cyclists use food as fuel, which is obviously energy-intensive. ulrich goes on to point another downfall associated with cyclists: they have a tendency to live longer as a result of more frequent exercise, thereby lengthening the amount of time they have to suck back the planet’s resources. the article is somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but is cause for reflection on what seems like a black and white issue.
an interesting ted talk by catherine mohr examines the concept of embodied energy through a simple example of using paper towel vs. a reusable cloth to clean up a spill – which is the greener choice? the knee-jerk reaction would be to choose the cloth – it can be reused countless times, as opposed to that paper towel that brought trees down in order to be created. look more closely though, and the issue becomes cloudier. how much hot water do you use to rinse that cloth? how often do you launder it? was it made from organic cotton and vegetable-based dyes? it’s a thought-provoking example, and one of countless decisions we make on a daily basis.
in light of all this, we’re all hedonists by nature. to borrow some wise words from the band trooper, “i’m here for a good time, not a long time.” i’m not going to spend my days sweating over these tiny decisions – they’ll be made with the best possible information i can source out, and i’ll move on. on my brand new bike.